Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: BIGLOOK

BIGLOOK, Since that posting to you I have read that the “151” is the state code for Hawaii.

Obama’s alleged cert shows “151 1961-010641”. It encodes the state (151 is Hawaii), the birth year (1961), and remaining number may be a serialization of the filing of a birth record within a year.

Based on births for Hawaii in 1961 according to US Vital Statistics, there were 17578 births in Hawaii in 1961. Assuming they are equally distributed per day, the 10641 corresponds to August 8th. Obama claims to have been born on the 4th, and his birth announcement is printed in local papers on the 13th, so it is likely the 10641 number is the serial number of when the birth was recorded in 1961 in Hawaii.

Would your son’s cert # match to that theory that the last sequence of digits is a serial number? US vital stats are found at

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/pubs/pubd/vsus/vsus.htm


5,364 posted on 08/24/2008 10:31:17 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5335 | View Replies ]


To: bvw
Not a bad theory, bvw....but over here there's a little competition for having the first child born on January 1st, New Years Day. That alone disrupts the pattern.

I don't know whether he was born here; the CoLB originally published on the web was bogus, since there was no embossed seal and no Registrar's signature. Now if there's a new copy proffered, I still consider it suspect. When asking the state for another, you get a 6"X8" reproduction of the Registrar's file, which is also embossed with the seal and signed by the current Registrar. My son traveled to the Philippines this year and that's what he submitted to the Pass Port control to obtain a pass port.

I think the original certificate is a one time deal, copies are file copies.
5,366 posted on 08/24/2008 10:51:14 AM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress! It's the sensible solution to restore Command to the People.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5364 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
10641 number is the serial number

It IS the serial number. It references the COLB for the 10,641st child born in 1961. That it also calculates out to the beginning of August is incidental.
5,370 posted on 08/24/2008 12:28:36 PM PDT by Beckwith ('Typical White Person')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5364 | View Replies ]

To: bvw
Obama’s alleged cert shows “151 1961-010641”. It encodes the state (151 is Hawaii), the birth year (1961), and remaining number may be a serialization of the filing of a birth record within a year.

Based on births for Hawaii in 1961 according to US Vital Statistics, there were 17578 births in Hawaii in 1961. Assuming they are equally distributed per day, the 10641 corresponds to August 8th. Obama claims to have been born on the 4th, and his birth announcement is printed in local papers on the 13th, so it is likely the 10641 number is the serial number of when the birth was recorded in 1961 in Hawaii.

It's really better than that. Unless you believe the August 8 filing date was just picked out of the air which as you know, I believe that is in fact likely the date of a real filing, the 10641 number is arithmetically perfect. If you had access to the records, you did exactly the calculation you did--you go to the records to which your political supporters have access with that number, asking who really has that number; you look the person up and find he is dead so you appropriate his number, knowing that he is not in a position to find out and complain. You were prepared to pick the closest number you could find where the real person was no longer available; but you were able to clear the perfect number and used that.

5,371 posted on 08/24/2008 1:38:43 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5364 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson