Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
“Hawaii should release all pertinent records pertaining to the Mr. Obama.” I don’t believe Hawaii can legally do that, I am not sure.

You're probably right about that. However, just to be devil's advocate for a minute, what if the document is a forgery? Would Hawaii be able to look up their records and see if there is a certification on file with a number for Obama? If yes, then they stay quiet. If no, then there is no legal barrier to Hawaii saying they have confirmed that there is no record on file.

Just to play with that hypothetical a little longer, would Hawaii be protecting a liar's "right to lieprivacy" by not exposing the fact that a document does not exist when a party says that it does?

Do I have a right from all the states that I wasn't born in, for those states to not expose that they don't have a birth certificate on file for me, just in case I choose to lie to somebody about it for gain?

-PJ

3,475 posted on 07/14/2008 12:33:42 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3399 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

“However, just to be devil’s advocate for a minute, what if the document is a forgery? “

I have felt from the get-go that if there was a legal document, either passport or birth cert, that contradicted the bio verson of things, that it would leak out somehow, irrespective of the legal privacy constraints.

“Would Hawaii be able to look up their records and see if there is a certification on file with a number for Obama?”

The Dept of Health thinks their laws forbid sharing Obama’s BC data with FOIA requesters.

This blog is attempting to get Obama’s birth cert. directly through FOIA request:

http://mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com/2008/07/additional-correspondence-re-obama.html

They made a request and got denied. See more here:

http://mitchell-langbert.blogspot.com/2008/07/is-hawaii-manipulating-obama-related.html

It was refused on this basis:
“To protect the integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure their proper use, and to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital statistics system, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health.” - Hawaii public records law,
“ If no, then there is no legal barrier to Hawaii saying they have confirmed that there is no record on file.”

I am including the full law below for edification of others.
The one way to get at the record reliably would be via a court order, and one way to do that is to sue Obama on the basis of his lack of eligibility.

I would think that Obama’s release of his (redacted) birth certificate should act as a mitigation of normal privacy concerns. His BC is a public concern to attest to his eligibility for President. Hawaii should be able to at least attest that the information released publicly matches what Hawaii has on file.


A. Hawaii Revised Statutes (bold added)

§ 338-18. Disclosure of records.

(a) To protect the integrity of vital statistics records, to ensure their proper use, and to ensure the efficient and proper administration of the vital statistics system, it shall be unlawful for any person to permit inspection of, or to disclose information contained in vital statistics records, or to copy or issue a copy of all or part of any such record, except as authorized by this part or by rules adopted by the department of health.

(b) The department shall not permit inspection of public health statistics records, or issue a certified copy of any such record or part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant has a direct and tangible interest in the record. The following persons shall be considered to have a direct and tangible interest in a public health statistics record:

(1) The registrant;

(2) The spouse of the registrant;

(3) A parent of the registrant;

(4) A descendant of the registrant;

(5) A person having a common ancestor with the registrant;

(6) A legal guardian of the registrant;

(7) A person or agency acting on behalf of the registrant;

(8) A personal representative of the registrant’s estate;

(9) A person whose right to inspect or obtain a certified copy of the record is established by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction;

(10) Adoptive parents who have filed a petition for adoption and who need to determine the death of one or more of the prospective adopted child’s natural or legal parents;

(11) A person who needs to determine the marital status of a former spouse in order to determine the payment of alimony;

(12) A person who needs to determine the death of a nonrelated co-owner of property purchased under a joint tenancy agreement; and

(13) A person who needs a death certificate for the determination of payments under a credit insurance policy.

(c) The department may permit the use the data contained in public health statistical records for research purposes only, but no identifying use thereof shall be made.

(d) Index data consisting of name and sex of the registrant, type of vital event, and such other data as the director may authorize shall be made available to the public.

(e) The department may permit persons working on genealogy projects access to microfilm or other copies of vital records of events that occurred more than seventy-five years prior to the current year.

(f) Subject to this section, the department may direct its local agents to make a return upon filing of birth, death, and fetal death certificates with them, of certain data shown to federal, state, territorial, county, or municipal agencies. Payment by these agencies for these services may be made as the department shall direct.

(g) The department shall not issue a verification in lieu of a certified copy of any such record, or any part thereof, unless it is satisfied that the applicant requesting a verification is:

(1) A person who has a direct and tangible interest in the record but requests a verification in lieu of a certified copy;

(2) A governmental agency or organization who for a legitimate government purpose maintains and needs to update official lists of persons in the ordinary course of the agency’s or organization’s activities;

(3) A governmental, private, social, or educational agency or organization who seeks confirmation of a certified copy of any such record submitted in support of or information provided about a vital event relating to any such record and contained in an official application made in the ordinary course of the agency’s or organization’s activities by an individual seeking employment with, entrance to, or the services or products of the agency or organization;

(4) A private or government attorney who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record which was acquired during the course of or for purposes of legal proceedings; or

(5) An individual employed, endorsed, or sponsored by a governmental, private, social, or educational agency or organization who seeks to confirm information about a vital event relating to any such record in preparation of reports or publications by the agency or organization for research or educational purposes.


3,531 posted on 07/14/2008 8:46:55 PM PDT by WOSG (http://no-bama.blogspot.com/ - NObama, stop the Hype and Chains candidate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3475 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson