“If we had the certificate number, we can verify the existence of the real document, and then confirm the contents.”
That would do nothing for me, I dont have access nor rights to HI’s databases.
“We are being asked to believe the contents of the document, but the one piece of information that links the image to the real thing is lost.” False. The format, wording, content have been analyzed. And suspicions have been raised due to it.
What you are asking for is for Obama to wave the original in front of the cameras and show to journalists.
“It begins to feel like the “fake, but accurate” of older days”
I am sure he has the COLB, and that is what was shared (scanned version). He wont do more than this. Why not? Because it will suit them much better if this rabbit trail is pursued by the right-wing ‘crazies’, and the activity used to discredit his opponents should it get out of hand.
But we know Obama has such proof and such documents. His passport is a proof of US citizenship, and he has one.
The probability that his passport says anything other than “honolulu hawaii”? Nil. And if his passport has that, then prior in his life he provided sufficient proof of it to authorities. The COLB image therefore does have indirect confirmation of validity.
Agreed. A Statement of No Record and a DS-10A saying cross my heart he rilly rilly rilly was born in Honolulu suffices to get a passport that says he was born in Honolulu.
Once again, don't believe me, go to the State Department website and see for yourself.
(Everyone who has is laughing at you, in case you didn't know)...