One key remaining concern with Obama’s COLB is that the border ‘doesnt match’ a similar form from 2002.
As null-and-void asked, why is the format different, if its the same form revision? Well, KJC1’s form should address that concern.
If the numbers were mostly blacked out and the surname blacked out, you could share the key important similarities while reatining anonymity.
KJC1, if you have a scan of the COLB, I can do the needful things and share, if you nor noone else can do so.
All personal information could be blacked out while retaining the headers (Date of birth, Mother's name, Father's name, etc). None of that is relevant. Perhaps if KJ doesn't have the program (although it can be done in paint), she could send it to JR.
Do you think these people will believe YOU if you posted my BC? No, they wouldn’t. That is why having Jim Robinson be the one to evaluate it would be important.
They wouldn’t believe me if I posted it; they won’t believe you either.
My BC says “Rev l1/01” just like Obama’s, and just like the DeCosta BC. Null and void mentioned that this shouldn’t make sense. That is a point I would agree on, but again, I am accepting the DeCosta BC as legit. Her BC looks very different than mine and Obama’s.