I really don't care if you think that "smells." I have since acknowledged that there must be more than one version of BC abstracts, but I 100% solidly maintain that the DeCosta BC does not look like mine (which looks just like Obama's). That is a fact.
Thanks for the courtesy ping, but it became clear to me about a week ago that some here don't give a flying fig about hearing things that don't fit their conspiracy. Instead of banging my head against the wall trying to stop the madness, I have decided to take a more passive role and simply watch this debacle in amazement, sometimes with audible gasps/outbursts of laughter and how doggone WRONG some of you are and you don't even have a clue you are off base at all. Oh well, at least this disease is isolated to just a few off on the backroom. Thank God this isn't on FR's front page anymore. :^)
So did you or did you not wished to be pinged with the results of the FOIA request?
the deCosta document shows it was ACCEPTED in May, 1930.
... I have since acknowledged that there must be more than one version of BC abstracts...
Due to regular Revisions of the format,perhaps?
The date on the rear of the obama document, is, IMO the date the document was issued.
It would be most helpful if you would supply us with the date your FILED certificate was issued. Can you do that?
Where in California are you?
Not that I don’t trust you, or anything like that, but I’d really like to see your birth certificate with my own eyes.
I’ll show you mine...