Preponderance of evidence? Such as?
The FACT that the form is different than other known good copies of the same data and revision number?
The FACT that the border on the alleged BC IS ON A DIFFERENT LAYER in the posted document's image file?
The FACT that a host of artifacts in the posted "blank document" exactly match the alleged BHO BC?
The FACT that document has different text in the form than known good documents?
The FACT that the time and location of birth just happen to be EXACTLY the same as on the posted 'fill in the blanks and make your own' "blank document".
What koolaid drinker are you trusting for the Gospel Truth here?
Trust me on this one, when someone asks you to ignore the evidence of your own eyes, they are up to no good.
What gets me is the psychology of the analysts. You have AJ demanding homage for all what he is that we can not be. For example almost nobody can work on Commodore 64's anymore. They are pretty rare. And not everybody works at NASA, and on satellites and such. AJ tells us how great he is by telling us how impossible it would for us to be him, and approach his PhD-devouring ferocity. He makes himself big by making everybody else small.
And I can understand, maybe, why the Colossi of the Spheres Blogal, like LGF, like all the others who signed onto AJ's bold "analysis", and used it as a club to bang the rest of us on forums like FR, or on smaller blogs into the party line. Why? Because they want to be BIG too, and are not philosophically disinclined to make others small in so doing. Which of those blogs have self-search features, like FR has? Why not? Isn't the voice of others as important as their own?
FR is great that way -- FR's strength is in how accessible it is to those who have to do no more than remain somewhat civil.
And compare that you-small-ME-BIG attitude to Pam Geller's Atlas Shrugged blog's master tech, techdude, himself. Techdude begs us all, or at least some of us to become like him. Bit by the bug of computer forensics, he would be happy to have many be like himself. "Join the analysis yourself" -- he recommends, and promises to show us how.
Refreshing.
“The FACT that the form is different than other known good copies of the same data and revision number?”
Debunked. A similar form was posted by a freeper on this thread.
“The FACT that the border on the alleged BC IS ON A DIFFERENT LAYER in the posted document’s image file? “
Fact or claim? AJ Strata didnt acknowledge that.
“The FACT that a host of artifacts in the posted “blank document” exactly match the alleged BHO BC?”
Because we now know that the blank doc was derived from it, as OpenDNA assserted in the first place as AJ Strata analysis confirmed. That debunks one claim the ‘its a forgery crowd’ was making.
“The FACT that document has different text in the form than known good documents?” Not all forms are exactly the same is all. As noted above, a freeper posted a BC that had the exact same form as Obama’s, showing that it was valid in its form relative to other legit BCs.
“The FACT that the time and location of birth just happen to be EXACTLY the same as on the posted ‘fill in the blanks and make your own’ “blank document”.”
Duh, because the ‘fill in the blanks’ form was derived from it. That’s been the BIG LIE of the “Blogger admits Hawaii birth certificate forgery” from the get go - the blogger admitted no such thing! He admitted taking the Kos image and playing with it, and some people just got the order derivation wrong.
“What koolaid drinker are you trusting for the Gospel Truth here?”
This was a KOS setup from the get-go and the conspiracy-minded fell for it hook-line-sinker. It was and is a distraction from the real issues with Obama.
Obama was born in Hawaii, and I stand by this statement: The BC on Obama’s website might well be legitimate, in fact the preponderance of evidence points in that direction.