Why do you say "I would like to either look myself or have somebody look..." then say "we looked; it wasn't there"?
It is posted on this thread--in the early going. And it's a link to an article to someone who looked in published news reports in the Hawaii newspapers and found no mention of any birth that might be Obama in the last week of July through the end of the second week in August.
You need to look for Barack H. Obama; Barry Dunham; a host of possible names for the baby; you need to look for a mother named Stanley or Ann or Dunham or Obama or anything close.
You don't know whether the person who looked did it correctly; maybe they made a mistake; if you get in a lawsuit over the issue, you won't rely on a news report, you will want an affidavit; probably someone who could give live testimony--"there is no newspaper report of his birth". If true.
All birth records I’ve seen published in newspapers do not list the child’s name - only the parents and whether the child is a boy or girl. As in, “Thomas Jones and Veronica Jones, boy”, or in the event unmarried, John Smith and Sarah Golden, girl.
So if you concede that the person looking could have possibly made a mistake in their search, you can’t then say definitively “we looked; it wasn’t there.”
I have followed this thread from the beginning but just to be sure I've gone back and scoured it for any mention of newspapers being searched or links to someone searching newspapers and I can find nothing. Possible that I missed it? Sure...but I would think even if I missed the original post that you're referencing, I would have at least run across responses to that post and I can't find any of those either. So I think, in all fairness, you need to provide a direct link to the person who searched the newspapers or stop saying a search was conducted and nothing was found in any newspaper.