Replies

But that link does not in any way refute the
‘case closed’ nature of the evidence that the Obama jpeg is *not* a fake. They found the bleed through from the embossed stamp, something that was ‘missing’ on early inspection that ‘proved’ it was a fake (that’s what Israel Insider was saying), and was actually there ...

http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/06/obamas-birth-certificate-issue-resolved.html

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5626
“Then 8 days after his original forgery claim, Polarik finally discovers the items that bleed through from the back, providing hard evidence the two version from Kos and the BHO campaign are actually digital images of an authentically produced birth certificate, created last year. But he was all confused because the Opendna version of the file did not have any bleed through section - thus forgery was at hand again. One day before Polarik’s post on the time stamp, Doug Ross did a great job of showing the time stamp, the stamp of the state seal and the signature area impressions coming in from the back of the Kos and BHO Campaign images, further proving their authenticity”

None of the followups dispute that. It’s pretty weak indeed to fall back on image error rates and not look at the image itself.