Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: WOSG
Your #2405:

You can keep reciting this stuff but believe it or not, I am not an armchair lawyer, I am really admitted--in two states. And although I am not a litigator by profession, I am admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States; and have argued probably ten or twelve appellate cases including two that were affirmed without an opinion by the Supreme Court.

I would love to have this for a client that could afford to pay to get to the courts although the time to do that is slipping away rapidly.

2,440 posted on 07/08/2008 3:24:55 PM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2405 | View Replies ]


To: David; null and void; Raycpa; WOSG
Not discounting any of the wonderful, cogent and detailed discussion had here about Presidential birth requirements.

Still ... here is a citizen, a historian, who wrote about what the "natural born" clause means. In his view (and mine) Obama would not be considered "natural born" by the extended intent of that phrase at the time of framing and adoption.

On TexasDarlin blog, "Judah Benjamin"'s Divided Loyalites, Obama’s Eligibility Problem — Part 1

3,929 posted on 07/25/2008 3:09:39 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2440 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson