Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: null and void; David; Raycpa
It's an unsettled area of Constitutional understanding. But only if one unties words and phrasing from their intended purpose! Which is what the courts have been fond of doing, even the originalists.

What was the purpose? I think as Washington said in related matters -- "To avoid foreign entanglements."

The "natural born" clause is there ONLY because Washington wanted it there. He was a great man.

It is something exactly like the Obama's Dad situation he wanted to avoid. Why? He did not want to have a US President who was a Prince or a son of similar potent family.

Obama, himself, is the marker of the kind of entanglement Washington (and John Jay) wanted to avoid. How is that? When Obama went back to Kenya and campaigned for his cousin!

2,173 posted on 07/07/2008 2:42:50 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2170 | View Replies ]


To: bvw

You mean Washington wanted write anyone like Lord Stirling out of contention for President?


2,206 posted on 07/07/2008 5:11:14 PM PDT by muawiyah (We need a "Gastank For America" to win back Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson