Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
I tend to believe the interpretation of 1970 was what was meant.

And I agree with you. As far as I'm concerned McCain meets the full Constitutional requirements for the job.

But you and I don't get to make that call.

IF it comes to serious question, the Supremes get to make the call.

2,166 posted on 07/07/2008 1:47:36 PM PDT by null and void (every Muslim, the minute he can differentiate, carries hate of Americans, Jews & Christians - OBL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2162 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
But you and I don't get to make that call.

Of course not, we're all just playing armchair lawyer here. But what the Constitution says wouldn't mean anything anyway if it were a court full of Ginsbergs.

2,168 posted on 07/07/2008 1:50:54 PM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2166 | View Replies ]

To: null and void
IF it comes to serious question, the Supremes get to make the call.

I am not sure they would. I think they might kick it to the House. The jurisdiction of the court over the election process for this would be questionable in my mind.

2,169 posted on 07/07/2008 1:54:49 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2166 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson