[David]

In 1960 and 61 Kenya was still part of British East Africa. The records of everything but surveys probably got shipped to London for final disposition. The Brits did that . . . .

It is positive that the Brits managed East Africa because there were good civil records.

Do you suppose those records (marriage, divorce, and birth) were shipped back at the end of the Brit occupation? I know lawyers in London--investigation would be easier and cheaper there than in Kenya. And further, less subject to interference from Kenya government employees and agents who may well view it as adverse that an effort is under way to disqualify a Kenya native born.

Note that the purported acquisition of the birth records reported in the Wayne Madsen update occurred in Kenya.

[muawiyah]

One of the reasons I don't believe such marriage records could be acquired in Kenya is that it wouldn't be consistent with British practice to leave such things about as they pulled out of their colony.

I doubt marriage records were created for the Naaaitivezzz anyway.