Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Raycpa
If it is effective for births after 1986, why include language that contradicts the effective date?

I have no idea. All I can tell you is what the the statute says and what the effective date clause says.

That particularly material originates in a Technical Corrections Act which implies to me based on my experience with Tech Corrections bills in the tax area that the original statutory intent was not to apply the 1952 date which was already in the statute but rather the 1986 effective date and the original bill drafter did not get the language and Congress did not want to further amend the statute because it would make it more difficult to read correctly so it provided for the 1986 result in the effective date. But that's just my speculation, based on similar experiences in the tax area.

2,088 posted on 07/07/2008 5:54:00 AM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2038 | View Replies ]


To: Raycpa

Read the original Section 1245 (personal property depreciation recapture) and the effective date clause for a good example of a statute where the application date and the effective date are different.


2,101 posted on 07/07/2008 7:47:10 AM PDT by David (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2088 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson