[WOSG]

“But a passport based on fake documentation is not a valid one. It may be a real one, but it’s not valid. And it will be taken away at the first opportunity after it’s determined that the documentation submitted to obtain it was false.”

And a Senator would get a bit more scrutiny.

The likelihood that his passport has faked/false info on it is infintesimal.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

What was the likelihood that his campaign would support a fake birth certificate?

What was the likelihood of his being 3 in 1967 according to that one article and appearing 3 in the picture when he was supposed to have been born in 1961?

What are they hiding?

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

What was the likelihood that his campaign would support a fake birth certificate?

What was the likelihood of his being 3 in 1967 according to that one article and appearing 3 in the picture when he was supposed to have been born in 1961?

What are they hiding?

[null and void]

And a Senator would get a bit more scrutiny.

Riiiiiiiiiggggght!

Senators are above question. Didn't you get the memo?

[bvw]

Assumptions. And I am close to certain that the “Senator getting more scrutiny” one is absent any basis in fact.