Posted on 07/03/2008 4:35:19 PM PDT by SE Mom
Thats the whole point of a seal. Nice try. Robin.
If WOSG is Robin, does that make KJC1 Batman, or the Joker?
Rudeness is no substitute for evidence or logic.
Agreed. A Statement of No Record and a DS-10A saying cross my heart he rilly rilly rilly was born in Honolulu suffices to get a passport that says he was born in Honolulu.
Once again, don't believe me, go to the State Department website and see for yourself.
(Everyone who has is laughing at you, in case you didn't know)...
A Certificate of No Record and a DS-10A statement from an older relative suffices.
You don't even need a birth certificate.
“Why is it that the seal can be seen on the latest version and not the original?”
Because the ‘original’ posted by fightthesmears site had the resolution cut in order to post it on that site. That’s part of what caused all the confusion in the first place.
The source of the fightthesmears, KOS, and factcheck.org images is the same: It’s from the Obama campaign.
It’s further interesting that KOS cropped their image, and factcheck.org left it alone. Factcheck.org was helpful enough to provide the person on the Obama campaign who gave it to them.
“I have a simple answer, we are looking at a progressive forgery backed by experts whose sole job is to fix or debunk the flaws in the original until the latest version of the forgery is unassailable.”
There is one original version, so that theory doesnt work.
I know Desmond Tutu and Barry Toot Toot is no Tutu...
Once again, you are proposing a theoretically possible scenario, but have no evidence at all that it actually happened.
In his first book, Barack mentioned seeing his birth certificate in with old documents, when he was a youth. If his family had that, they would never have gone the DS-10A route. And surely his birth certificate said Honolulu, or his firstbook would have been a *far more interesting* bio. I said earlier that there’s a 99.9% chance his passport has “Honolulu Hawaii” on the basis of a birth cert. that said the same. There is maybe a 0.1% chance your scenario is valid.
You are speculating out of thin air.
It make tx a flake.
We’ve now gone into ad super-hominem. :-)
For anyone who would "buy" such a video, I can get you a great deal on an authentic Leonardo da Vinci autograph. He signed in with his ball point pen. I can prove it. I was there. I have photographs...
-PJ
Huh?
He's admitted his mother wasn't married. The big secret is out
He now has NO REASON to not release his real BC.
What is Barry Toot hiding now?
Are you familiar with the concept of layering where items can be imported into a JPEG and then all the layers combined to make a single layered image?
The KOS version is one such version as is fight the smears, both of which are missing the seal.
Factcheck unless they have a certified true laser printed original from the state of Hawaii has yet another version of what KOS first posted on their website.
Ummmmmmmmmmmmm, doesn't that mean he perpetrated a fraud on the American public by releasing a forged document on his website?
Oh, would it be ungracious for me to rub WOSG and KJC1's noses in the established and admitted fact that the certificate they have so passionately been defending was indeed altered and was a false representation of the truth?
Probably, but what the heck...
WOSG: “You CANNOT deduce from the graphic Obamas website posted that the original COLB it was produced from is invalid.”
N&V: “So any gross errors, use of the wrong phrase, or badly stitched together borders made of the wrong size diamonds doesn’t count?”
I meant by my statement that there are no ‘gross errors’. Such claims are not correct. The ‘wrong phrase’ claim was busted/disputed by KJC1, who has a COLB with the same phrasing as Obama’s.
“You can’t prove a web image is from a genuine document.”
I have never disagreed with that. My disagreement is with those who claim to ‘know’ its a forgery or claim ‘proof’ of it. They’ve not proven anything thus far.
Snapshot.
Compare to later in the day...
(Damn you! I should have thought of that one!)
And for my own part, I had better get back to my work, for these discussions have indeed sucked dollars out of my account, by way of me not doing what I can bill.
“Barack Obama panics: Andy Martins book forces Obama to admit he is illegitimate”
“Ummmmmmmmmmmmm, doesn’t that mean he perpetrated a fraud on the American public by releasing a forged document on his website?”
Um no. I noticed from the get-go that the COLB he released had her maiden name on it. Did you not notice? You cannot infer marital status from his COLB.
“Oh, would it be ungracious for me to rub WOSG and KJC1’s noses in the established and admitted fact that the certificate they have so passionately been defending was indeed altered and was a false representation of the truth?”
Yes it would be, since its still not the truth. We are talking about the validity of a COLB, not a marriage license. Nobody has admitted Obama’s COLB is not valid or that his place and date of birth is wrong.
The public report is a marriage in Maui on feb 2, 1961 and a divorce in 1964 in Hawaii. If anyone is disproving that public account, its a separate matter from his birth cert.
They CAN'T. They can prosecute for election fraud and falsification of official documents, and the judge may or may not decide to release the true documents.
But due to the right to privacy they can't release his documents without his permission or a court order.
Thank God.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.