Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Another fun one from LST.
1 posted on 07/01/2008 2:19:51 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last
To: mnehrling

Why is Ron Paul not President?

um...cause he’s a freakshow?


2 posted on 07/01/2008 2:24:29 PM PDT by TheGunny (Re-read 1&2 Corinthians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

If Ron Paul is so insignificant, why is there so much discussion about him? I have read dozens and dozens of articles linked from this site and others that talk about how insignificant he is, and how his supporters don’t matter at all.

Seems like if someone was truly insignificant you wouldn’t have to write a bunch of articles saying that he was.


4 posted on 07/01/2008 2:28:54 PM PDT by PastorTony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

Issue for issue, I’d take Paul over either two.


5 posted on 07/01/2008 2:30:36 PM PDT by stevio (Crunchy Con - God, guns, guts, and organically grown crunchy nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling
Because the 28th Amendment of the Constitution forbids a live fruitcake from holding the Office of President...
6 posted on 07/01/2008 2:31:02 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

I just discovered that the Libertarian Party is blatantly pro-abortion.

I can see why Paul did run under their banner.

Wonder what happened to Barr....I didn’t know he opposes the right to life for babies.


7 posted on 07/01/2008 2:32:32 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain -- Those denying the War was Necessary Do NOT Support the Troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

His mini me Bobby Barr is just as much a flake and his Obama views being anti war, for gay marriage, legalize drugs, and Bobby Barr is on his third marriage.


9 posted on 07/01/2008 2:34:41 PM PDT by SoCalPol (Don't Blame Me - I Supported Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

I’ll agree that Paul comes off as eccentric, but I don’t think he ever really had a chance at winning. His message is what got people moving. Constitutionalism and limited government (real limited government not the lip service we get from many Republicans) is very appealing and at the very core of conservative values. Besides his anti-war stance, I’m not sure why so many republicans pound him so harshly. And even his anti-war stance has some merit. I don’t completely agree with it, but the fact that the executive declares de facto war without Congress actually declaring war is something to be frightened about. It is a blatant disregard for the Constitutional process, and Congress goes along with it, which is also scary.


11 posted on 07/01/2008 2:35:49 PM PDT by djsherin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

I think the fact that not enough people voted for him just might have had something to do with it.


15 posted on 07/01/2008 2:36:55 PM PDT by RichInOC (No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling
"...you can blame Dicky Flatt’s buddy, Phil Gramm"

Lormand and Ron Paul's nemesis, Phil Graham

I knew there would be yet another reason to like Phil Graham.

21 posted on 07/01/2008 2:41:48 PM PDT by lormand ("The Planet is fine, the people are $%#ed up" - George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

I dunno... Cuz he’s a moonbat?


25 posted on 07/01/2008 2:44:23 PM PDT by Redcloak ("Yes, I have been drinking. Why do you ask?" #1 on the list of "Things heard from McCain voters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

did he run in the last election? Cuz...you kinda gotta run to become prez, dontchaknow?


28 posted on 07/01/2008 2:48:04 PM PDT by Cailleach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

Because 1.2 million votes wasn’t enough.

I do remember the Bushs in Texas, along with Gingrich and the republican establishment in Washington, being so afraid of Ron Paul getting back in congress in 1996 that they recruited Greg Laughlin to switch from the democratic to the republican party. Paul defeated Laughlin in the run-off republican primary election in 1996 and went on to defeat democrat Charles “Lefty” Morris in November.


32 posted on 07/01/2008 2:53:59 PM PDT by Baron OBeef Dip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling
Why is Ron Paul not President?

cause he can't see over the Presidential Podium ?
33 posted on 07/01/2008 2:54:45 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 1riot1ranger; Action-America; Aggie Mama; Alkhin; Allegra; American72; antivenom; Antoninus II; ...

Houston PING


48 posted on 07/01/2008 3:07:45 PM PDT by weegee (CHANGE? A more truthful slogan would be to proclaim Obama the candidate of FLIP FLOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Also, wasn’t ol’ Phil Gramm once a democrat?


51 posted on 07/01/2008 3:13:00 PM PDT by Baron OBeef Dip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling
On most issues Paul is to the right of McCain. I see very little to be chuckling about.
56 posted on 07/01/2008 3:18:54 PM PDT by Jay Redhawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

Ron Paul is not president because he is the conservative equivalent of Dennis Kucinich. He is a nutcase.


58 posted on 07/01/2008 3:22:53 PM PDT by big'ol_freeper ("Preach the Gospel always, and when necessary use words". ~ St. Francis of Assisi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

Oooooooooo, oooooooooohhhhh, Mistah Kottah!!! Mistah Kottahhhhhh...I know...I know!!!

(Steve raises his hand furiously to get attention!!!)


65 posted on 07/01/2008 3:51:34 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (Houston Area Texans (I've always been hated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling
I thought Libertarians were all about personal responsibility?

No, libertarians are all about personal responsibility. On the other hand, Libertarians are generally just a bunch of whiners who drape themselves in pseudo-libertarian cloth.

The Libertarian Party is as much a home for libertarians and the Republican Party is for conservatives.

85 posted on 07/02/2008 10:29:59 AM PDT by kevkrom ("This is not the [fill in the blank] that I knew" - Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mnehrling

Good read I heard this interview he did on Iran and gas prices a few weeks ago..good stuff

http://feeds.radioamerica.org/podcast/GKE/audio/000004_002794.mp3


92 posted on 07/02/2008 10:50:36 AM PDT by badgerfan1976
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-24 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson