Ah. More baseless insults. I guess I hit pretty close to the mark eh? LOL! tsk tsk.
No, I'm quite the opposite by any definition of the word, but can you guess what I think about you based on your attitude and anatomy?
One more chance to rationally discuss the issues instead of going all liberal (read: emotional) and ad hominem. I'd really rather that.
Well, if Ms. Ingraham had not been constantly dumped by her fiances and/or boyfriends in the past few decades, then maybe this almost 44-year-old might be happily married. Her biological clock is clicking away to oblivion.
So bad luck with men (if it is indeed just bad luck) is justification for choosing to raise a child in a fatherless home? Especially, when by her own words she has said that "Under attack from all sides, the traditional family is now regarded as just another social arrangement, no better than any other."
That "traditional family life is the healthiest for us and for the future of the society"
Those are her words, not mine.
I'll say..."under attack from all sides" now includes her.
Men don't like strong women, and Laura is pretty strong-minded. Her fiance James Reyes dumped her in 2005 after learning of her breast cancer ordeal.
Some men don't. I love em, as do many others. Ask my wife and daughter. In addition, as I said already, Laura said her cancer had nothing to do with their breakup. She has never discussed the reasons.
Your spouse is one lucky woman, I guess. Does she live in a windowless cellar?