Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: badguy2200; All
I do use Chinese sources as well as Tibetan sources as well as American and British intelligence sources for my information. The problem with you is that you simply lie when it suits you. Every post you make creates a bad impression that the Chinese people are as dishonest and untrustworthy as the CCP.

Tibet

The Government of Tibet in Exile quotes an issue of People's Daily published in 1959 to claim that the Tibetan population has dropped significantly since 1959. According to the article, figures from the National Bureau of Statistics of the People's Republic of China show that the autonomous region of Tibet was populated by 1,273,969 persons. In the Tibetan sectors of Kham, 3,381,064 Tibetans were counted. In Qinghai and other Tibetan sectors that are incorporated in Gansu, 1,675,534 Tibetans were counted. According to the total of these three numbers, the Tibetan population attained 6,330,567 in 1959. [66]

By dishonestly not counting Khams and Qinghai, regions almost solely inhabited by Tibetans prior to the Chinese invasion of the '50s, badguy2200 can tell the lie that there were only 1 million Tibetans in the '50s. But we can clearly see that there were at least 6 million. These people would not identify themselves as anything but Tibetan. Check the sources at my link and everyone can see that these figures actually came from the Chinese government. That should make it clear to all that badguy2200 is not misinforming us because he has been lied to by the CCP. This information is available to him but he lies anyway because his intention is to intentionally misinform the rest of the world. That is CCP policy.

232 posted on 05/21/2008 4:58:38 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

TE did you water the chia pet too much again? Sigh, I told you that we can’t over water them!


234 posted on 05/21/2008 7:04:01 PM PDT by pandoraou812 (Don't play leapfrog with a unicorn! ...........^............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

To: TigersEye

dishonestly not counting Khams and Qinghai, regions almost solely inhabited by Tibetans prior to the Chinese invasion of the ‘50s, badguy2200 can tell the lie that there were only 1 million Tibetans in the ‘50s. But we can clearly see that there were at least 6 million. These people would not identify themselves as anything but Tibetan. Check the sources at my link and everyone can see that these figures actually came from the Chinese government. That should make it clear to all that badguy2200 is not misinforming us because he has been lied to by the CCP. This information is available to him but he lies anyway because his intention is to intentionally misinform the rest of the world. That is CCP policy.


1,well, “1 million “ I refered is the population of Tibetan in Tibetan autu region in 1950,which is not your “greater Tibet”.
what Dalai ruled is just “tibet auto region” today,where there was only 1 million Tibetan. Now, there are 2.5 million Tibetan there.

2,the “Greater TIbet” only existed during 7th-12 th century.
Before 7th century, Han-Chinese had settled in Qinhai for over 700 years. When Han-Chiense started to settle in Qinhai,Rome was still fighting against Carthage.Where was Tibet at that time?
After 12th century,”Great Tibet” collasped. Mongols controlled Qinhai for over 500 years.then Manchus and Han-Chinese controlled it. During Qing dynastry, Kham and Qinhai both were out of the control of Dalai.

3,those who lives in Kham and Qinahai is far more than Tibetan.
there are 6 million Yi,7 million and a lot of Qiang,Mongol..etc. all those ethnics live there for hunderds of years at least.some of them even live ther longer than Tibetan.
Even not counting millions of Han,how can you let 6 million Yi accept the rule of 5 million Tibetan?
would you like to make another Balkan?


243 posted on 05/22/2008 1:28:32 AM PDT by badguy2200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson