Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: badguy2200
Tibet indeed enjoyed semi-autonomy or even entire autonomy before 1950,but it can deny that TIbet was a part of CHiense empire.It was one of “inner vassals “ of Chinese empire,just like Mongolia.

That's funny. If they had "entire autonomy" how could they be a part of China? Apparently your education didn't include logic.

It was one of “inner vassals “ of Chinese empire,just like Mongolia.

Except when Mongolia conquered China and China was an inner vassal of Mongolia...and put under the authority of Tibet. LOLOL

127 posted on 05/20/2008 3:46:19 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
That's funny. If they had "entire autonomy" how could they be a part of China? Apparently your education didn't include logic. how about Canada before WW I or Porto Rico today?
134 posted on 05/20/2008 4:18:10 PM PDT by badguy2200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson