Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

That is what YOU stated in your previous post. Are you now changing your position?


well, my prvious post said:

” rural tibetan peasant benefit less from the moderniaztion;tibetan citizens benefit a lot from modernization”
“ the less education of Tibetan is not the fault of Chinese government,just as the less education of black in USA is not the fault of USA’s government”

does it contradict against the fact that Han-Chinese owns most business in Lhasa?
even if Han-Chinese owned the most of business in Lhasa,that is just because Han-Chinese work harder and better than Titetan. it would be nothing with privileges or special favorable treadtement from Chinese government!

the success of Han-chinese in Southeast Asia and USA can prove it.As we know, Han-Chinese are still very rich ,although they are suppressed politically by local aboriginal in southeast Asia.


103 posted on 05/20/2008 2:20:40 PM PDT by badguy2200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]


To: badguy2200
does it contradict against the fact that Han-Chinese owns most business in Lhasa? even if Han-Chinese owned the most of business in Lhasa,that is just because Han-Chinese work harder and better than Titetan.

It contradicts what you said before that it was rural peasants that rioted because they had been left out ecomically. All Tibetans have been left out...in their own country. It is hard to compete with barbarians who kill and torture you just for speaking of the Dalai Lama.

107 posted on 05/20/2008 2:28:47 PM PDT by TigersEye (Berlin 1936. Olympics for murdering regimes. Beijing 2008.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson