[allmendream]

I never said I know very little about the subject (let alone “VERY LITTLE”); what I said was that I had no particular expertise and have not done any work on the subject myself and so would be relying upon the work of Scientists that the “HIV doesn't cause AIDS” group has already rejected.

“I am not an expert on either virus or HIV and would be relying entirely upon the body of knowledge that your “expert” has already rejected.”

So is this going to be about HIV/AIDS or about I.D./Creationism? Whatever the subject, have your pet Pedigreed Scientist post their data and I will engage it, the offer still stands from lo those many moons ago and I take exception to your characterization of this stand as “backing away” multiple times from a debate.

[GodGunsGuts]

==I take exception to your characterization of this stand as “backing away” multiple times from a debate.

Your exception is duly noted. I will once again try to get the wheels of progress turning on the AIDS debate. And if you are still game to engage where we left off on the “codes upon codes” debate, in addition to whatever I might have to say on the matter, I would be happy to look for a Creation/ID scientist to engage you on that topic as well.

Olive Branch: For some reason, the bitter taste emanating from the tail-end of our previous exchanges “many moons ago” still lingers. I actually enjoyed our banter when our paths first crossed. But all that changed when the DC crowd jumped in. We both became different people when that happened. That’s the way I see it anyway.