Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: savedbygrace
Therefore, the laws the Congress really has passed that have been interpreted to restrict schools receiving federal money from teaching religion ought be be null and void.

No one protests the teaching of their own religion. The purpose of the SCOTUS ruling was to prevent OTHER PEOPLE'S religions from being taught. Unfortunately for you, your religion is other people's religion to people of different faiths, and no more valid without scientific evidence.

174 posted on 04/20/2008 2:36:51 PM PDT by Soliton (McCain couldn't even win a McCain look-alike contest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies ]


To: Soliton

That’s a non-responsive reply that displays your failure to understand the plain words of the 1st Amendment.

The 1st Amendment restricts the Congress from passing certain laws. It does not restrict the people.


182 posted on 04/20/2008 2:47:47 PM PDT by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson