[Soliton]

That statement was nowhere in my post.

It is of no help in determining what, who, or whence that entity is. If you insist on pushing that point, you are no longer talking about ID.

Take a look at post 55 and then take your meds.

[thulldud]

...but we aren’t allowed to ask “what, who, or whence that entity is”?

That is cut and pasted from post 58. Emphasis added.

That is what you claimed was cut and pasted from me.

Ergo, I conclude that no profit is to be had in discussion with you. Especially when you add in gems of this sort:

Take a look at post 55 and then take your meds.

Argumentum ad hominem is often the sign of a weak case.

[philetus]

Take a look at post 55 and then take your meds”

Post 55, what he posted:It is of no help in determining what, who, or whence that entity is.

What you posted:I hope so. I did a cut and paste from your post

Your “cut and paste”:

but we aren’t allowed to ask “what, who, or whence that entity is”?

Seems to me, that makes you a liar