To: processing please hold
Elizabeth Hopes story had no corroboration. She never knew Darwin or had, to anyones knowledge, ever been to his home or hometown. Darwin was close friends with his local parish priest. If he was going to have a change of heart on the death bed he would have called for his friend not the widow of an evangelist preacher who was a stranger from many miles away. She has no credibility and no corroboration.
Moreover as I pointed out, Science is true even if the original discoverer decides he or she no longer finds the evidence convincing. Einstein could have shouted E=mc cubed all he wanted; it wouldn't have changed that it is E=mc squared.
168 posted on
04/18/2008 9:51:31 PM PDT by
allmendream
(Life begins at the moment of contraception. ;))
To: allmendream
197 posted on
04/19/2008 7:08:24 AM PDT by
processing please hold
( "It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.")
To: allmendream
If he was going to have a change of heart on the death bed he would have called for his friend not the widow of an evangelist preacher who was a stranger from many miles away. She has no credibility and no corroboration. Actually she was the evangelist not her husband, She married twice: to a 69 year old retired Admiral, and a 74 year old pork magnate, by this gaining a title and money.
Incidentally the suppose visit to Darwin was only 3 months after her first husband's death. She evidently didn't follow the mourning practice common to a person of her station in society of the time.
201 posted on
04/19/2008 8:13:26 AM PDT by
Oztrich Boy
("Never apologize, Mister, it's a sign of weakness" - Nathan Brittles)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson