Why are you leaving out 150+ years worth of advances in evolutionary science?
It's not much of a "science" if it consistently avoids the tough questions.
The theory has advanced, surely, but the gaps and the issues avoided by its adherents has also multiplied.
I find it strange that the most advanced geneticists and molecular biologists simply marvel at the statement that the advancements in the complexities of living things happened randomly, or in conveniently packaged mind-boggling complete "packages", and always toward improved complex systems.