Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: PeterFinn

The Sara or Sarah with the 2 wk old baby hadn’t been seen since the Sunday before the 2nd raid.

Just because Ms Swinton has been arrested does not mean the case falls apart. As it says on PAGE ONE of this thread, she was questioned by the Texas authorities but they didn’t file any charges.

How does the case fall apart? As has been posted many times by others, and also by me, the children were removed from the ranch due to a second search warrant, which contained affadavits of what was seen by investigators when they served the first search warrant. NOT because of what was alleged in the phone calls.

Please, I beseech you, and all others who are reading this, please read the links, please read the original articles, and please read the threads.

All the information I’ve given you in this and previous posts is either on this thread, or one of the others, many many times. I’m not being arrogant, I’m just wondering why people jump in and repeat the same old thing time after time, to the point where it sounds like they are reading off the same talking points sheet of paper.

*sheesh*

The fact that somebody says the calls were bogus and this lady made them doesn’t mean it’s true. I’m willing to wait for the answers, aren’t you?


291 posted on 04/21/2008 1:28:52 PM PDT by Judith Anne (Don't just do something! Stand there!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]


To: Judith Anne
The fact that somebody says the calls were bogus and this lady made them doesn’t mean it’s true. I’m willing to wait for the answers, aren’t you?

And where was your patience when the subject was waiting for answers at the cult ranch? Shouldn't the Texas authorities had a little more to go on than a second hand and unconfirmed report by one person before they went in to upset the lives of several hundred people?

Seriously, since the allege point of all of this was to rescue this one girl then shouldn't they have done a little due dilligence to determine the girls whereabouts before they went in?

Because let's say the girl is real. This raid endangered her life if she was not at the ranch when the raid occured. The raid and all of the media coverage would tip off whoever that the girl needed to disappear. So shouldn't her security have been a paramount concern and priority for this whole operation?

And since there hasn't seemed to have been a great deal of concern about this girl from the start on the part of the Texas authorities people like myself and Michael Savage have had cause to be concerned what the actual goal of the raid really was.

See, they say the raid was about this girl, but once the raid was over they didn't seem too concerned at all about her.

It just smells bad.

292 posted on 04/21/2008 1:59:59 PM PDT by PeterFinn (Charlton Heston & Ronald Reagan - my two favorite Presidents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 291 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson