Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: CaspersGh0sts

Foxnews just reported that in only nine out of 22 states tonite reporting results that its winner take all. Seems to me that what happened in WV is the norm in how states decide to award their delegates. If Romney loses in GA and some of those other southern states tonite is going to complain about Huckabee winning in them as well just cuz Romney doesn’t think Huckabee should be running for the Office of the Presidency. And what about Ron Paul? Paul’s been getting around five percent in nearly every state as I can tell.

Should Romney tell both Ron Paul and Huckabee to get out because neither of them are viable?

When and if Romney and his supporters do that is democracy at work?


490 posted on 02/05/2008 4:13:35 PM PST by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies ]


To: marajade

I don’t believe that the claim is that Huckabee “is not viable”....rather, the claim is that neither Huck nor Mitt is viable if both stay in....thus, the argument goes, Huck (if he were truly conservative) would get out so conservatives could consolidate and stop McCain.

If Huck was really trying to win (he’s not) he would be saying the same in reverse.


539 posted on 02/06/2008 12:09:04 AM PST by WillRain ("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson