Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ravingnutter

“This delegate situation in WV is just dishonest. How can you defend that? You denigrate Reagan’s name by doing so.”

Dishonest? It’s called politics. The WV Republican Party has a right to run the caucuses the way they want to run them, without outside interference. Reagan would be all for that, and you know it. Reagan tried cutting deals to win the nomination in 76, does that make him dishonest too?

Look, I think Romney’s a nice and decent guy. I have nothing against him at all. I think he would be a very weak candidate however. He is proving that despite the money he is spending he’s not getting the necessary support and votes he needs to win.


120 posted on 02/05/2008 1:25:35 PM PST by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley & The Clinch Mountain Boys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan79

I can live with deal making, it’s the whole pretense that they are not in league I find dishonest. Come out and be honest with the voters about what your deal is and if they still want to support you (Huck( knowing it’s a proxy vote for McCain, then so be it.

Especially for a man running under the banner of “good Christian”


478 posted on 02/05/2008 3:51:13 PM PST by WillRain ("Might have been the losing side, still not convinced it was the wrong one.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson