The state rights issue has more to do with federalism than opposing anti-abortion or marriage protection laws.
Dobson endorsement would be bigger than NRA imo because of the shock value behind it. It would be a tremendous blow to the Huckster.
This would be a perfect 1-2 punch on him.. #1 Nailing him as a liberal on debate night, #2 Dobson endorsement.
WHEW
“Dobson endorsement would be bigger than NRA imo because of the shock value behind it. It would be a tremendous blow to the Huckster.
This would be a perfect 1-2 punch on him.. #1 Nailing him as a liberal on debate night, #2 Dobson endorsement.”
Agreed....SO SEND FRED SOME CASH...!
www.fred08.com
That’s in the morning. Then, at noon, the NRA endorses him and by 3pm, Rush is doing fundraising on the air for Fred.
“Onerom99” wrote: “The state rights issue has more to do with federalism than opposing anti-abortion or marriage protection laws.”
You’re misunderstanding what I wrote. Even if Roe v. Wade is overturned, Senator Thompson has said consistently since 1994 that he wouldn’t support state laws to prohibit abortion. During his 1994 campaign he said, “I’m not willing to support laws that prohibit early-term abortions.” He told Project Vote Smart, “Abortions should be legal in all circumstances as long as the procedure is completed within the first trimester of the pregnancy.” He explicitly refused to support laws prohibiting abortions for convenience:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=P5a_Fpu_8KE
In 1996 he signed a document saying, “I do not believe abortion should be criminalized.” He still personally opposes laws to prohibit abortion:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=F1tfGh3ITCc
http://youtube.com/watch?v=kTQxoXD-scw
http://youtube.com/watch?v=H-b1xQNRA4g
Here’s a quote from his November 7 conversation with Tim Russert:
“When I saw—and again, ALL CONSISTENT WITH WHAT I’VE SAID [emphasis mine]. I—people ask me hypothetically, you know, OK, it goes back to the states. Somebody comes up with a bill, and they say we’re going to outlaw this, that or the other. And my response was I do not think it is a wise thing to criminalize young girls and perhaps their parents as aiders and abettors or perhaps their family physician... I do not think that you can have a, a, a law that would be effective and that would be the right thing to do ...”