Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: aj7360
But like Duncan, Fred ALSO doesn’t have a snowball’s chance.

Since I'm old enough to have supported Reagan's first run, I'll put your remark down to youth. history can, and often does repeat itself.

21 posted on 12/26/2007 9:10:03 AM PST by MrEdd (Heck is the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aren't going.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: MrEdd

I won’t repeat all the criticisms of Fred’s campaign. We’ve all heard them, and most of them are true.

As long as Huckabee is in the race, Fred can’t portray himself as the choice of social conservatives. One reason for that is that Fred really isn’t one, and it’s going to be hard to put himself to right of a Baptist preacher on those matters.

The pundits are all saying that Huck’s rise is a blow to Romney. Perhaps it is, but I think it hurts Thompson at least as much. Thompson basically peaked before he formally announced, and it’s been mostly downhill ever since.

He’s not going to win Iowa or New Hampshire. He’s already conceded that. Yet, he’s still spending valuable time in Iowa. He should be in Florida, or California or any of the other 21 Feb 5 primary states.

He’s either getting horrible advice, or he’s making horrible decisions on his own. I don’t see how he can win the nomination, except if nobody emerges as the clear frontrunner the morning of February 6. He might stand a good chance in a brokered GOP convention as a compromise nominee.


22 posted on 12/26/2007 12:15:00 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson