Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: ejonesie22
Even your boy understands that . . .

Whoah! What happened to the meme of the last few months that Paul would surrender to the terrorists and not defend us?

How can this be?

If he understands that national defense is a legitimate role of the federal government then there is no reason to suppose that he would fail in carrying out that role.

You're straying from the script.

177 posted on 11/07/2007 11:40:10 AM PST by ksen ("For an omniscient and omnipotent God, there are no Plan B's" - Frumanchu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]


To: ksen
I have no problem that Ron Paul would defend us AFTER something happens. I have said that before.

But “after” in 2007 is not the same as “after” circa 1789...

We have to be a bit more aggressive in our defense than you boys seem to realize or want to acknowledge

183 posted on 11/07/2007 11:46:38 AM PST by ejonesie22 (Real voters in real voting booths will elect FDT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson