Posted on 10/23/2007 7:49:12 AM PDT by blogsforthompson.com
“Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson is choosing a county with a large farmworker population to announce an immigration policy Tuesday that will include stripping federal grant money from cities and states that don’t report illegal immigrants.”
OH, HELL, YEAH!
****************
LOL! A new FR classic! :)
He does call them illegal aliens, just like he uses the term Islamofascist.
(Note: I'm not saying Fred has flip-flopped or that he is pandering. I'm pointing out the absurdity of those who make those kinds of statements about other candidates who, like Thompson, have seen their positions on some issues evolve over time towards the conservative.)
“The general populace will not have the stomach for it (deportation) after the first year,”
The Democrats won’t, but not the general populace.
You’re thinking of the party group-think that sees life as one Hollywood movie after another: conservatives: `The Handmaid’s Tale’; nuclear war: `The Day After’; global warming: ‘The Day After Tomorrow’; deporting illegal aliens (`fugees’): `Children of Men’.
Most Americans want them drop-kicked out asap. Period. They won’t be herded together in concentration camps. I’m thinking a slow freighter to Gitmo, then an open gate to Cuba.
Let their buddies take care of them: many Mexicans vacation in Mexico, and their country can ship them home, if it wants, and start paying some of their freight.
vacation Mexico=vacation in Cuba
ping
I, however, will vote in the Iowa Caucus for Huckabee.
Oops, make that Tancredo. Tancredo should be able to score points from this by pointing out that Fred's presidential proposal is to do what he's already done from his weak position of power in Congress.
If immigration is a hot button issue, we don't want Fred as our nominee. He was joined at the hip with Spencer Abraham who except for Ted Kennedy was the biggest enemy of immigration sanity. Diane Feinstein will campaign for the Democrats against Thompson's weak immigration record and she will have the authority to do since Thompson voted with Abraham against her amendment to reduce chain migration.
The "listen to what I say now, not how I voted back then" plea will not fly and it will undermine his "look how I voted on abortion, not how I lobbied for abortionists" argument.
I would like to see troops, retired cops, volunteers, etc., armed to the teeth and closing the border.
“It’s even more problematic than that. Not one of the “round ‘em all up and deport them now!” crowd can put forward a workable plan to do so under the following realities:
* The plan must not infringe civil liberties
* The plan must ensure that not one U.S. citizen or legal resident is accidentally detained or deported”
I’m not trying to challenge you here, but someone else’s post made me think - what if we told all illegals to go back to their country. On your way out, register your departure. Once all those who are currently in line to immigrate are processed, we will start immigration back in the order in which you departed. After 6 months of this, any illegal caught who is obviously not trying to follow our laws would be immediately deported to NEVER be allowed back (how’s that for incentive). All those “mostly” law abiding illegals would now have the chance to get back FROM THE OUTSIDE and would have paid a mighty inconvenience as punishment for breaking the law.
Of course, a physically secure border must be achieved to make any of this work.
I guess she doesn't read the same articles I do; nor get the same emails from Euro relatives that I do. Both continually point out the freeloading and perks handed out to the 'kings of the road' (mostly illegal) "immigrants".
Malmo is in Europe. So is the Paris suburb of Clichy-sous-Bois, along with the rest. So is London and Birmingham, and Luton, England UK.
Maybe she was referring to the German policy of cutting off benefits to women who refuse to take a "job" in the "sex industry".
Or, maybe she was referring to selective enforcement, against Christians and/or Americans?
BUMP! It is about time one of the candidates would take the lead on this issue and I just tickled it is my candidate, Fred Thompson.
Given this appears to be a flip flop on Fred’s part (I agree with the post above #38), (not to mention a steal from Duncan Hunter’s playbook), I expect we’ll have to do a lot of reading between Fred’s lines again in order to see through this little dog and pony show. No doubt in my mind, positions don’t change on a dime and anything he’s proposing will equate to Bush’s “Comprehensive Immigration Reform” = no amnesty AMNESTY and a ‘technologically’ (un)secured border. I’ve no reason to trust Fred Thompson now.
Within weeks of the first wave of court challenges and news articles about the plight of the poor Mexican families, national will will fold like a house of cards.
This isn’t hollywood, its political reality circa 2007 in “American Idol” USA...
Today we need not round up millions, we need only turn off the attractions to those that can’t prove they are here illegally legally.
So that it will be SPOT ON!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.