[spunkets]

"Would it make you proud that the law worked and a law abiding citizen was killed but the killer didn’t get a gun in legal markets? Would it make the citizen any less dead?"

Where'd you learn logic, a code dink seminar?

"How about if that law abiding citizen was mistakenly denied the right to purchase the means of self defense?"

There's a remedy in place. Besides that, the person should have thought of such a possibility before the threat became immanent.

"The laws that you support make it difficult for the good guys to get one to defend themselves."

No, that's clear in all that I've said. I only support those laws that do not violate substantial rights and keep the guns out of the bad guy's hands. Substantial rights does not include nukes. In fact a bozo with a nuke is an ememy of the US.

[Harvey105]

And now you blame the victim for not being prepared ahead of time. Some people come to the party late due to lack of awareness and indoctrination. Then you want to add injury to insult and make them wait capped off with blaming them for not acting sooner.

Unbelievable.