>> You mean returning to traditional Constitutional principles? That’s a danger to the U.S.?
No, I mean his stubborn dogmatic isolationism (whether appropriate or not), and failure to appreciate that we interact in a world that is MUCH more interconnected than it was back in the days of the privateers going after the pirates.
Those things are neither “constitutional” nor are they smart or safe for the country.
Paul supports interacting with nations, via trade.
That's much different than meddling in the affairs of other nations, giving them massive foreign aid boondoggles (which will be used against us) and such.