Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: rednesss
Not very, as the reactions are only able to be sustained under intense pressure and temperatures exceeding 10 million degrees C, all the while being contained by massive magnetic fields.

Isn't fusion much cleaner too? I think its byproducts aren't radioactive?

12 posted on 08/13/2007 10:13:45 AM PDT by BearCub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: BearCub

Ehhh, well the containment vessel becomes highly radioactive due to neutron bombardment. Most reactions being researched are some combination of Deuterium and Tritium yielding an energetic Helium-4 atom and a very energetic neutron. Some are looking at Helium-3 and Deuterium.


14 posted on 08/13/2007 10:24:06 AM PDT by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: BearCub

Tritium is one of the byproducts and it’s smoking hot (~12 yr half-life) but it’s valuable and would be recycled and consumed. This is in addition to the containment vessel being made radioactive by neutron activation, as already pointed out.


18 posted on 08/13/2007 12:37:54 PM PDT by coloradan (Failing to protect the liberties of your enemies establishes precedents that will reach to yourself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson