Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: drzz

Those are all nice and dandy, but not nearly as legitimate as the terms of the ceasefire from the first Iraq war. Iraq was to have refrained from any hostilities against our planes over the no-fly zone.

Every week, Iraq locked on or fired missiles at such planes, effectively ending the ceasefire and allowing us to blow him completely to Hell.

That was the true reason it was not pre-emptive.


4 posted on 07/11/2007 11:14:37 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind
Bingo, if one wanted to fight this on legal grounds, the very first time Sadamn fired on one of our planes in the no fly zone, we had the right to attack... There are so many reasons, it would probably make our tax code look small. The reason why ‘now’ versus ‘later’ was specifically to pre-empt future aggression and support for terrorist states. That is the reason for timing, not the only reason for ‘why’...
8 posted on 07/11/2007 11:17:15 AM PDT by mnehring (Virtus Junxit Mors Non Separabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson