[colorcountry]

I have said nothing uncivil. Telling the truth is not uncivil and I have yet to name-call. Never, not once, have I called someone a hater, a bigot, a bitter old hag, Imam, unAmerican or furryball.

I have however been called all of these things. Some of them by you.

I am responding to a challenge, I have been called a bigot on FreeRepublic and so has any other Republican who dare to withold a vote for Romney because of his beliefs in a specious faith. Am I allowed to respond to that challenge? I certainly hope so.

But thanks R-esque, for posting a thread calling me a bigot and then accusing me of incivility for responding. Perhaps if you quit posting such inflamatory articles you would not get that response. ..Or are you looking for it?

[restornu]

I never called you a furryball CC and that is one of endearent names.

Hands off my furryball sister!:)

[Reaganesque]

On May 21, I posted a thread that had, as it's original topic, Mitt Romney's use of the word "golly." Twenty-two days, 954 replies and 5,708 views later, this thread is still active with you and others arguing Mormon theology. I can only draw the conclusion from this that anything and everything I post will be considered to be "inflammatory." Therefore, taking your sensibilities into account when deciding to post is not, shall we say, practical. As to name calling, there has been plenty of that on both sides here so you are not the only victim.