Skip to comments.
Does Fred Thompson Have The Work Ethic He Needs To Be President?
Right Wing News ^
| 5/2/07
| John Hawkins
Posted on 05/02/2007 8:46:55 AM PDT by areafiftyone
Does Fred Thompson Have The Work Ethic He Needs To Be President?
A week or two ago, I was having a conversation about Fred Thompson and the person I was talking to said something like, "So, with all the columns he's writing and his admission that he has cancer, he's definitely running right?"
I told them that if I were betting, I'd say that he was running, but that there was a more significant chance than you'd think that he won't. Why?
Well, look at it from Fred Thompson's perspective. He has a reputation as a guy who doesn't particularly enjoy campaigning and let's face it; he has a pretty good life. He has a successful career as an actor, lots of money, and probably a good bit of leisure time to spend in a nice house with his attractive wife.
So yes, he's dipping his toes in the water to see what it feels like and yes, the water feels warm and inviting, but running for President is anything but a glamorous, exciting job, especially for someone like Fred Thompson.
Running for President means that you spend six to eighteen months with every 15 minutes of your 6 day a week, 12 hour plus schedule per day mapped out by staffers. It means thousands of calls to friends and admirers to ask them for money. It means constant travel. It means you need to enjoy plunging into a crowd and shaking hands for 20 minutes, talking to people at a rural mall, and sitting around in a diner in Iowa eating mashing potatoes and signing autographs. Meanwhile, during those 18 months or so, the press and your political enemies will be combing through your background and every word you say looking for a way to utterly destroy your reputation. Then, even after all that, only one candidate out of what, about 20 on both sides, is going to win the election?
Let's just put it this way; it's definitely not for everyone and judging by this article that appeared in the Politico, I'm not sure that running for President is right for Fred Thompson either.
"Thompson has not made a final decision but is on track to be ready to announce his candidacy in June or July, his advisers say. Thompson has already been polling better than some of the announced GOP candidates, and his entry would shake up a field that has left many Republican faithful dissatisfied.
...Thompson, his wife and advisers in Washington and Tennessee also are drawing up plans for a new style of campaign that would rely heavily on technology and his celebrity status to avoid some of the slogging through the snow in Iowa and New Hampshire that is normally required of White House hopefuls.
The advisers say Thompson, who plays District Attorney Arthur Branch on NBC's "Law & Order," is researching ways to use technology -- including the Web, videoconferences and teleconferences -- to harness the enthusiasm for his candidacy among grass-roots bloggers and activists. The campaign also would rely on large events, such as those that have in part supplanted country-store campaigning for some in the Democratic field.
"Well-known candidates can do things a little differently," explained one adviser. "You show up, you're accessible, but you don't have to go to every county seat several times."
...Originally, the idea of a late-start campaign for Thompson looked like something of a lark, but the phantom candidacy is accelerating. "The question is: Can he do it the way he wants to do it?" said another person helping plan the potential campaign. "With each passing day, he realizes that the answer is yes."
...So just how practical is a low-impact presidential campaign? Thompson's floundering campaign for Senate in Tennessee took off after he got his red pickup truck, and now he wants to bring a similar dash of showmanship to the '08 race. "Because of his name ID, he doesn't have to go diner to diner and church to church," said one adviser.
On the day Thompson revealed he has cancer, he hinted at an unorthodox blueprint when he said that he thinks it's possible to join the field without abandoning his family.
"Going on the road for months at a time, and for all practical purposes, just checking [in] every once in a while, I wouldn't do that," he told Fox's Neil Cavuto. "I don't think it has to be done that way. I know people will expect that of everyone -- to run frenetically around for years. And I don't do frenetic very well."
Let me translate what this statement means; "Because of his name ID, he doesn't have to go diner to diner and church to church." It means that Fred Thompson likes the idea of being President, but he doesn't want to do the hard work it takes to grab the brass ring.
Saying you want to be President, but you don't want to spend your time meeting with the citizenry is like saying you want to be a professional basketball player, but you don't want to go to the gym every day to practice.
It may be understandable that Thompson feels that way, because he currently has a very comfortable life, but if that's his attitude, the Republican Party would be better off if he didn't get in the race in order to ensure that someone who has the work ethic it takes to be President can capture the nomination.
I consult for the Duncan Hunter campaign through TCV Media.
TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: fred; fredthompson; rfr; runfredrun
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
To: Silly
What's with this idea that acting is a cushy job? That's not what I said. I was just re-stating the article writer's interpretation of things "from Fred Thompson's perspective."
If the writer thinks that Fred Thompson doesn't have much of a work ethic, I wonder how he figures Fred has managed to accomplish what he has accomplished: as a lawyer, as a public official, and as an actor.
Just a side note on what you said about acting skills. Do you know the first time I really noticed the skills acting involves besides delivering one's lines? When my youngest son was a baby, he had terrible colic. My wife and I would take turns trying to comfort him, and many nights I would sit with him in a rocking chair, watching TV with the sound off. It was then that I really noticed facial expressions and how the actors reacted to each other with body language. I realized how that was nearly as important to the performance as the lines and I began to appreciate what skill it takes to do that well.
And that's why I'm not an actor.
To: mkjessup
Enjoy your popcorn. I have many more posts to deal with. :-)
42
posted on
05/02/2007 11:36:40 AM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(.....We mourn and hurt and will never forget, but we don't live under fear.... Rudy Giuliani)
To: Politicalmom
43
posted on
05/02/2007 11:37:39 AM PDT
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --Bible Thumper and Proud! RUN, FRED, RUN!!!)
To: areafiftyone
Not sure why Reagan ran and not sure why Thompson is considering the run, maybe it is because they actually love this country and really want to make it better.
I realize that is a novel idea but it is just a thought.
To: pillut48
Can I post those from that link, or do I need to move it to my album? I might have to check that place out. My webshots album is filling up fast.
45
posted on
05/02/2007 11:40:49 AM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
To: areafiftyone
"I consult for the Duncan Hunter campaign"
No, really? I couldn't tell.
Obvioulsy, Duncan, an excellent man and conservatve (my # 2 choice), needs a different consultant, since he polls so low.
:O)
P
America. Together. Again
Fred Thompson for President '08
46
posted on
05/02/2007 11:51:27 AM PDT
by
papasmurf
(Patience is, not only, a virtue...it's also a weapon. Be patient FRed!)
To: areafiftyone
Among all of the searching I have seen among the frightened politicos who have already backed a horse in this race - this is among the most amusing.
Please, feel free to check my posting history, I’ve been saying for MONTHS that Fred should run, but that he should wait to announce until the dust has settled and the cannibals have eaten themselves clean for a while.
It is 8 MONTHS - (Yes, I am shouting) - 8 MONTHS until the first primary. All this early announcement momentum grabbing and shifting get in soon so I can book some interviews and people can learn my name junk is just that - junk.
Astounding - the man doesn’t see any point in going door to door in Iowa before the thaw - and that makes him lazy? Senator T is smart enough to know that as soon as he announces he becomes the front runner. And as soon as he becomes the front runner then every media outlet, every Democrat (was that redundant?), and every nutjob moonbat who froths at the mouth for Ron Paul or Pat Buchanan is going to start taking shots at him. Why stand in the firing line for 8 months when you can organize, prepare, and come out swinging for 4 months. The campaign isn;t even in full swing yet and the conservative critics are already trying to toss mud at him. Disgusting.
47
posted on
05/02/2007 11:52:18 AM PDT
by
BlueNgold
(Feed the Tree .....)
To: areafiftyone
“...Thompson, his wife and advisers in Washington and Tennessee also are drawing up plans for a new style of campaign that would rely heavily on technology and his celebrity status to avoid some of the slogging through the snow in Iowa and New Hampshire that is normally required of White House hopefuls.
The advisers say Thompson, who plays District Attorney Arthur Branch on NBC’s “Law & Order,” is researching ways to use technology — including the Web, videoconferences and teleconferences — to harness the enthusiasm for his candidacy among grass-roots bloggers and activists. The campaign also would rely on large events, such as those that have in part supplanted country-store campaigning for some in the Democratic field.”
I find this interesting as it means that he is looking for a way to bypass much of the “Drive by Media”. The “slogging through the snow” routine is mostly for the sake of getting media attention, as you really can not meet a very significant portion of the voters this way. It is obvious that Fred recognizes the fact that the days of the MSM media dominating a campaign are near an end and is looking to pioneer a new approach. The author of this piece is totally missing the picture. Of course, given the fact that he represents another candidate, that is not surprising.
48
posted on
05/02/2007 11:54:10 AM PDT
by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: Silly
I tried the logical attempt, once. People only see the end results of a successful acting career, so they can't imagine, even after getting on a hit show, that it's 12-18 hour days, and endless rehearsals and script changes and re-shoots because a lamp faced the wrong way in this shot, etc.
I was a part time lot boy at DesiLu in my youth, and I know some very successful actors. Believe me, it ain't all eatin' cake and ice cream. For the most part, they work their butts off.
BTW, Blake, my dark horse pick, ROCKED last night!
:O)
P
America. Together. Again
Fred Thompson for President '08
49
posted on
05/02/2007 12:06:21 PM PDT
by
papasmurf
(Patience is, not only, a virtue...it's also a weapon. Be patient FRed!)
To: Politicalmom
50
posted on
05/02/2007 12:11:42 PM PDT
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --Bible Thumper and Proud! RUN, FRED, RUN!!!)
To: highball
“Hunter ought to demand this guy retract his hit piece.”
If he doesn’t, it would make it look like he agrees with it and is OK with such tactics.
51
posted on
05/02/2007 12:12:40 PM PDT
by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
“Yes, you’re right about that. It tells me that some folks in the Duncan Hunter campaign are tremendously bothered by the prospect of a Fred Thompson run.”
It looks like the GOP establishment is not the only ones threatened by a potential Fred Thompson run.
52
posted on
05/02/2007 12:15:52 PM PDT
by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
So what you're saying is that Fred is all for division of labour, while the rest of the GOP pack are still in the hunting/gathering stage?
Post of the day!
53
posted on
05/02/2007 12:16:00 PM PDT
by
publana
(yes, I checked the preview box without previewing)
To: areafiftyone
The guy is spending time thinking, writing, meeting with key people and giving select speeches and media interviews.
Frankly, I think some of the other candidates should spend a little more time thinking and writing about their ideas. That would help them develop more consistent philosophies and solid positions, instead of running around after the latest polled ideas like 6-year-old soccer players.
54
posted on
05/02/2007 12:17:19 PM PDT
by
ellery
(I don't remember a constitutional amendment that gives you the right not to be identified-R.Giuliani)
To: ellery
“Frankly, I think some of the other candidates should spend a little more time thinking and writing about their ideas. That would help them develop more consistent philosophies and solid positions, instead of running around after the latest polled ideas like 6-year-old soccer players.”
BUMP!
55
posted on
05/02/2007 12:24:22 PM PDT
by
rob777
(Personal Responsibility is the Price of Freedom)
To: pillut48
I meant is it ok to hotlink to those addresses?
56
posted on
05/02/2007 12:50:24 PM PDT
by
Politicalmom
(Conservatives want freedom. Republicans want power.)
To: areafiftyone
I love the “Thompson doesn’t have the fire in the belly, so he shouldn’t run” argument.
I am of the opinion that those who aggressively seek power are almost always unworthy to yield it.
As for the “fire in the belly” argument: There was one man who had no desire to be president. In fact, many wanted to make him king of America, but he would have none of that. He relented and served as president ONLY out of a sense of duty. Nor did he want to serve a second term, but finally relented. He refused to serve a third term and went home, which is where he would have preferred to have been the whole time. This, of course, was George Washington.
Another was so lazy and unserious that he would meet heads of state at the White House dressed in pajamas and bedroom slippers. He also abandoned the practice of delivering the state of the union message - instead he wrote it out and sent it to Congress to be read by someone else. Another crappy president who would not meet areafiftyone’s criteria - Thomas Jefferson.
If those men were alive and running today, it would be amusing to see how they would be savaged and by whom.
57
posted on
05/02/2007 12:52:36 PM PDT
by
WWTD
To: Politicalmom
Don’t know about hotlinking, it might work or not! I guess go ahead and try!
58
posted on
05/02/2007 1:12:45 PM PDT
by
pillut48
(CJ in TX --Bible Thumper and Proud! RUN, FRED, RUN!!!)
To: rob777
The voters need to know a candidates position on the issues. They need to know what the candidate believes and thinks on the issues. This article does nothing but attack the man for no purpose than elevate another candidate.
Sounds like the Democrat modus operandi of all ages, past and present.
59
posted on
05/02/2007 1:45:06 PM PDT
by
K-oneTexas
(I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
To: rob777
Hunter ought to demand this guy retract his hit piece.
If he doesnt, it would make it look like he agrees with it and is OK with such tactics. Exactly.
This guy is a member of Hunter's team, and identifies himself as much. Everything he does, therefore, is a reflection upon Hunter's campaign.
60
posted on
05/02/2007 1:51:17 PM PDT
by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-83 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson