Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: supercat
They were licensed firearm dealers.

Assuming your statement is correct, it doesn't change the fact their intent for purchasing the weapons was to use them against anyone was not part of their cult.

Why not refer to their "large cache" with the term normally used to refer to dealer's stocks of weapons: "inventory"?

Semantics with words doesn't change their purpose for using the weapons.
67 posted on 02/17/2007 8:43:22 PM PST by Man50D (Fair Tax , you earn it , you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: Man50D
Assuming your statement is correct, it doesn't change the fact their intent for purchasing the weapons was to use them against anyone was not part of their cult.

And your proof of that assertion is what?

I've watched the Waco hearings. The BATF's conduct in the February raid was so reckless that the Davidians could have slaughtered them if they'd been so inclined. Indeed, I found it puzzling that when the agents talked about how they fired through walls at "Davidians" who were firing at them through walls, nobody at the hearing asked how the BATF knew they weren't shooting at each other.

80 posted on 02/17/2007 9:17:27 PM PST by supercat (Sony delenda est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Man50D

"the fact their intent for purchasing the weapons was to use them against anyone was not part of their cult."

Intent as shown how? Please refer us to sources that show the specific intent you speak of. Assertions and guesses do NOT prove anything.


83 posted on 02/17/2007 9:41:18 PM PST by JSteff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson