To: CWOJackson
You wrote, "...it should be whatever means of execution the killer used on his victim(s)."
I am an advocate of the death penalty but think what you're suggesting clearly constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, hence unconstitutional on its face. Besides, I've known a few prison guards--hardworking, decent, dedicated men. Could you honestly demand that correctional officers execute someone like Lawrence Bittaker using the killer's modus operandi, which--in Bittaker's case--consisted of torturing his victims to death with pliers?
Personally, I think the Chinese method, a bullet to the brain, is sufficient: quick, probably painless, and inexpensive.
To: Rembrandt_fan
I think the Chinese method, a bullet to the brain, is sufficient: quick, probably painless, and inexpensive.
Yeah - as a practical matter, putting aside the fun we're having considering more exotic or in the case of the bolt, more economical methods, I don't see why we don't do more executions with a bullet to the brain.
It's sure a heck of a lot less complicated and error prone than the gas chamber, lethal injection or electrocution methods that seem to be recommended these days.
64 posted on
12/16/2006 8:32:39 PM PST by
ThePythonicCow
(We are but Seekers of Truth, not the Source.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson