To: CWOJackson
I don't think the Supreme Court would ever allow strangulation with a telephone cord.
3 posted on
12/16/2006 6:45:42 PM PST by
doug from upland
(Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
To: doug from upland
What, and deny the prisoner his/her right to select their own form of execution?
I know it wouldn't work. Too many people who yawned when an infant is raped and strangled would go crazy if the murderer suffered in any way.
To: doug from upland
I don't think the Supreme Court would ever allow strangulation with a telephone cord.
Probably some sort of Interstate Commerce clause thing,
or maybe you'd have to pay a tariff or something.
8 posted on
12/16/2006 6:49:31 PM PST by
tet68
( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
To: doug from upland
Drag behind the car for 1/2 mile. Run over by a truck. Locked in a a freezer. Yeah, many that the Supremes probably won't allow.
24 posted on
12/16/2006 7:13:02 PM PST by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: doug from upland
Now that the telephone industry is deregulated, the supreme court should allow strangulation using a telephone cord.
34 posted on
12/16/2006 7:26:31 PM PST by
RLM
To: doug from upland
"I don't think the Supreme Court would ever allow strangulation with a telephone cord."
My choices for the court would!!!
52 posted on
12/16/2006 8:13:14 PM PST by
lawdude
(2006: The elections we will live to die for!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson