Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: nopardons

To answer your supercilious question: I've been national staff in three presidential campaigns and many smaller ones. Am very acquainted with both McCain and Rudy. Also worked for three TV networks. And that is the reason McCain and Giuliani might be the only possibility, since working for TV makes one believe that a conservative no longer has a chance, unless he is another Reagan running against a total lame-o like Carter. Reagan had had the previous media exposure to surmount the MSM bias toward Carter. This will not happen to Mitt Romney, a person who otherwise I think much better than the "dream ticket" members.

Also, reading skills: The third sentence in the first paragraph does address the VP problem.


28 posted on 11/16/2006 10:36:10 AM PST by daveinboca (Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: daveinboca
A question can't be "supercilious". It can have a supercilious TONE, the person asking the question can act in a supercilious manner, but since neither the tone of my query, nor myself had said tone or manner, you are way off base.

Your CV may, in your own mind, make you feel sure that your opinions are correct, but they aren't.

And FWIW there are many people here on FR who have been extremely active in politics and have far better credentials, vis-a-vis "being in T.V."; not to mention much more. I suggest that you deflate that puffed up chest of yours, stop patting yourself on the back, and refrain from the hauteur that is evidenced in your reply to me.

And BTW, my reading comprehension skills are very good. :-)

29 posted on 11/16/2006 1:32:34 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson