[Al Simmons]

*CREVO FLYING BRICK-BAT PING LIST*

Note: You have been pinged because I noticed you engaging in a spirited discussion on a previous CREVO thread. This is a low-volume, bi-partisan, ping list designed to bring the occasional interesting article on this topic to your attention. If you would like to be removed from this ping list, please drop me a FReepmail.

[hosepipe]

[ *CREVO FLYING BRICK-BAT PING LIST* ]

OUCH!... now stop that..

ID is Agnostic Creativism.. is that an oxy moron?..
No matter... the Chemical SoupNazis will not like it as an answer for orgins..

I know I know.. NO SOUP FOR ME TODAY...

[tacticalogic]

Crevo brickbats + low volume = wtf?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[Stultis]

Note: You have been pinged because I noticed you engaging in a spirited discussion on a previous CREVO thread.

Wha? "Spirited discussion?" Moi? How DARE you question my niceosity!

[RunningWolf]

Great idea Russ that you bring the occasional interesting articles about these topics and do it in a low-volume, bi-partisan format. Although I guess at some demarker it does become partisan and/or personal and that is a dynamic variable both as to the person and where he is at that period of time.

One place I approach it from is to remove from the equation any suggestion as to whether the 'solution' will ever be known in any sense approaching an absolute (or for another word truth)

So then, just just take a look at the case with the current 'best evidence'. Say for instance the 'hominid bones' and DNA. Those are 2 very good examples of layers of theory upon layers of theory that end up giving an illusion of reality.

The lastest area I have begun to question is the 'bedrock' of DNA. They must 'extract' the dna to do anyhting with it and the extraction process is part mechanical at the start and bio-chemical later.

Well think about it, take any compound and apply any any mehacnisism to extract a substance out of that compound and what you have have left is not a replica of the original. Now extrapolate this to a bio-chemical extraction mechanism to a compound such as dna and all the 'similarities' and retro viral insertions etc., may well end up being a random indicator of nothing or rather noise.

What do you think?

BTW, I will try to ignore the ditch bomb throwers and sideline 'placemarkers' that a certain other ping list seems to bring enmass with them

W.