To: PJ-Comix
Why would they complain? They got the film gutted out.
The refusal to grant permission to grab Bin Laden was fictitious, they said. But ask the author: that ONE scene was a literary conflation of TWELVE such incidents.
TWELVE TIMES opportunities to grab or kill Bin Laden were vetoed by the Clinton Administration.
TWELVE.
7 posted on
09/11/2006 7:54:33 AM PDT by
Petronski
(New York London Paris Munich Ev'rybody talkabout mmm pop music! Talk about!)
To: Petronski
Also, Clinton has been captured on audiotape admitting that he passed on taking Bin Laden, and that the Lewinsky matter was a factor in his "reasoning."
So why take out the limosine scene describing Clinton's decisionmaking to be affected by Lewinsky? </BitterSarcasm>
14 posted on
09/11/2006 7:57:41 AM PDT by
Petronski
(New York London Paris Munich Ev'rybody talkabout mmm pop music! Talk about!)
To: Petronski
I encourage everyone to spend this day listening to Rush Limbaugh and especially Mark Levin, to get the full poop on this Soviet-style censorship.
34 posted on
09/11/2006 8:10:40 AM PDT by
Petronski
(New York London Paris Munich Ev'rybody talkabout mmm pop music! Talk about!)
To: Petronski
Any details? I would really like to have details to present to the doubting Thomas's I have to associate with.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson