Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/26/2006 4:26:40 PM PDT by John Semmens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John Semmens
Considering who the Democrats are likely to nominate in 2008, who’s to say that a talented young singer would be a worse choice.”

Careful what you wish for....

Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting

2 posted on 08/26/2006 4:42:12 PM PDT by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Semmens
California Republicans reportedly are torn between what they say is the “blatant unconstitutionality” of the proposal...

How is this blatantly unconstitutional? It is a strange idea, but there is a difference between being a bad or silly idea and being unconstitutional. The Federal Constitution left the method of the selection of the Electors of the Electoral College completely up to the discretion of each individual state. If California wants to change its election law and throw its votes to some random person, its their right.

Its actually rather surprising that all of the Republicans aren't backing the Democrats support of this bill. Afterall, California almost certainly will lean to the Democrat candidate and thus giving California's electoral college's votes to a third party will make it more likely for a Republican to win. There is however the possibility that no candidate will receive a majority in the electoral college and thus the House will choose the President. In that case whoever controls the most state delegations in the House will win. (If the House chooses the President, Each state delegation gets one vote as called for by the XII Amendment).

3 posted on 08/27/2006 11:21:52 PM PDT by old republic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson