To: FortRumbull
Is this another eminent domain situation?
2 posted on
06/01/2006 5:11:02 AM PDT by
mtbopfuyn
(I think the border is kind of an artificial barrier - San Antonio councilwoman Patti Radle)
To: FortRumbull
My stance has always been that if the development of the property is worth that much, the government entity intent on possessing the land, and the developer intent on developing the land should be willing to shell out the necessary money required to convince the owner to part with the property.
If it requires eminent domain to obtain the land, it can't be worth the planned private development.
3 posted on
06/01/2006 5:16:30 AM PDT by
coconutt2000
(NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
To: FortRumbull; BlackElk
Yes, it is THE eminent domain case. However, if Governor Rell REALLY wanted to have fun, she could do the following:
She can wait for the deed to change hands and THEN pull an eminent domain on the new owners and decree the district historical (before the buildings get torn down). After all, those properties are a piece of history now!
She is, of course, a gutless RINO.
5 posted on
06/01/2006 7:25:28 AM PDT by
sittnick
(There is no salvation in politics.)
To: RaceBannon; scoopscandal; 2Trievers; LoneGOPinCT; Rodney King; sorrisi; MrSparkys; monafelice; ...
Connecticut ping!
Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent Connecticut ping list.
6 posted on
06/01/2006 10:23:37 PM PDT by
nutmeg
("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson