Skip to comments.
Election 2006, Election 2008
Our Tiny Little Minds ^
| May 14, 2006
| me, et al
Posted on 05/13/2006 8:32:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 521-524 next last
The big problem with the Baby Boom is, it will start to retire by 2011 (1946 + 65), with a peak (if memory serves) in 2016, after which the sheer numbers start to decline some, with a "boomlet" striking again circa 2023 (1968 + 65). If it weren't for the productive immigrant population supporting the Ponzi scheme that is Social Security...
1
posted on
05/13/2006 8:32:52 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
The reason I started this topic was that the poll came out, and I started to watch Saturday Night Defunct, and the reprehensible robot Al Gore gave the opening bit, a parallel universe state of the union.
| Work harder to get conservatives elected |
77.4% |
4,678 |
| Turn it over to the Rats |
22.6% |
1,367 |
Those were the results when I responded. Nearly 1400 idiots, eh?
2
posted on
05/13/2006 8:37:23 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
We tell these people to get rid of the rinos in the primaries.
They tell us they are unable to beat the rinos in the primaries.
I say they keep losing in the primaries because their numbers are too small and if they boycott or go 3rd party, it will not matter.
I even think it will be beneficial as a lot of good conservatives are fed up with their single issue, cry baby mentality.
I think if the single issue whinners quit, the adults will be more energized and we actually gain.
3
posted on
05/13/2006 8:41:47 PM PDT
by
staytrue
(Moonbat conservatives-those who would rather have the democrats win.)
The SNL host is...
4
posted on
05/13/2006 8:44:25 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: staytrue
5
posted on
05/13/2006 8:46:12 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: Berosus; Cincinatus' Wife; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion; ...
6
posted on
05/13/2006 8:56:49 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
To: SunkenCiv
Nearly 1400 idiots, eh?
Could be 1,400 people who are having a hard time seeing the difference between a RINO who pushes the liberal agenda and a Democrat who does the same thing.
7
posted on
05/13/2006 9:21:53 PM PDT
by
kingu
(Yeah, I'll vote in 2006, just as soon as a party comes along who listens.)
To: SunkenCiv
It's not just the failure of Bush and Congress to protect the borders. I refer you to the current issue of National Review magazine and a feature article by Kate O'Beirne and Rich Lowry.
It's a lengthy article describing the UTTER failure of the GOP majority not only to assert conservative principles and legislation but to actually promote part of the liberal agenda.
The old line that the other party is "worse" is neither inspiring nor motivating the base. All polls also confirm that.
Here's the last sentence of the article: "...nervous Republicans will ask themselves, Can this Congress be saved? But the question frustrated Republican VOTERS are increasingly asking is, Is it WORTH saving?"
8
posted on
05/13/2006 11:12:36 PM PDT
by
T.L.Sink
(stopew)
To: SunkenCiv
I think not securing the borders will destroy the party by frustrating the voters from coming out.
Do I think that is good? No.
Do I think the Republican party causes their own problems?
Heck yeah! The don't listen to a vast majority of the people and the act when in power like they are a weak minority.
9
posted on
05/13/2006 11:17:13 PM PDT
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: T.L.Sink
If border issues are a problem for Republican voters, The Republican Party isn't doing enough to protect the borders?
If you are planing to vote against the Republican Party, tell me what any other party has done to protect the border.
The Democrats have done nothing in protecting the border and, the Independent always vote with the liberals.
I don't like the way the Republican Party is working, but I am sure I would like the lying left and Independent a lot less.
10
posted on
05/14/2006 6:02:10 AM PDT
by
buck61
To: buck61
If the Republicans don't nominate someone in '08 who - for a change! - reflects the Reagan legacy, I'll write-in for Tancredo and let the rest of the GOP decide between "tweedle-dee" and "tweedle-dum".
Many will drop out because they're sick of having to decide who is bad and who is worse!
11
posted on
05/14/2006 2:56:12 PM PDT
by
T.L.Sink
(stopew)
To: buck61
buck61: If you are planing to vote against the Republican Party, tell me what any other party has done to protect the border. The Democrats have done nothing in protecting the border and, the Independent always vote with the liberals. I don't like the way the Republican Party is working, but I am sure I would like the lying left and Independent a lot less.
Well put. As the Dhimmicrat, Tip O'Neill said, "all politics is local". There will be so-called RINOs, simply because of their constituents. In the long term, only by being shown that certain (and obviously, not all) Republican ideas make more sense, and are not worth giving up by voting for the Dhimmicrats.
Also, in addendum, as the rest of the country goes, to some extent, so go the RINOs. If Republicans lose in places where clearly they should not, there will be no stopping the minority party, the Dhimmicrats.
Without the votes in 2006 and 2008, there won't be anything to do about the border, because the Dhimmicrats -- despite Hitlery's disingenuous comment on how we need to build a fence -- aren't interested in doing anything but putting up loudspeakers and tape-loop "c'mon over, we surrender". We will not gain by surrendering to the Party of Treason, we will lose everything. Supporting Republicans means we will not win everything. That's a little thing called life.
12
posted on
05/14/2006 4:46:03 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Looks like the "non-members" are trying to stuff the ballot box. Must be Dhimmicrats.
13
posted on
05/22/2006 10:32:39 PM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
The latest poll on FR is, for 2008, presidential vote, Tancredo vs Hillary. Current figures:
Tom Tancredo
83.8%
Third party
6.1%
Hillary
4.0%
Undecided
3.2%
Sit it out
2.9%
15
posted on
06/05/2006 9:57:25 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
16
posted on
06/05/2006 9:58:59 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
17
posted on
12/30/2006 1:51:05 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(It takes a village to mind its own business. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
CIA - The World Factbook (hint: not all are countries, and Taiwan and EU are now in alpha order, rather than at the end of the list as the CIA had 'em):
18
posted on
12/30/2006 3:43:19 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(It takes a village to mind its own business. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
19
posted on
01/09/2007 12:10:35 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
("I've learned to live with not knowing." -- Richard Feynman https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
20
posted on
01/09/2007 12:11:28 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
("I've learned to live with not knowing." -- Richard Feynman https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 521-524 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
