Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservatives Say Miers Is Obstacle to Judicial Nominees
HumanEventsonline {Blog} ^ | May 8, 2006 | Robert B. Bluey

Posted on 05/08/2006 4:42:02 PM PDT by Cautor

White House Counsel Harriet Miers, the Supreme Court nominee who withdrew after a conservative revolt last fall, has allegedly vetoed several recommendations offered by conservatives to fill vacancies on federal courts.

The White House would not directly respond to the charge, which was made this morning during a conference call with more than 40 conservative leaders. Two people on the call—whose identities I promised to keep confidential—said they had inside knowledge of the recommended nominees whom Miers nixed.

(Excerpt) Read more at humaneventsonline.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: harriet; judges; judicial; miers; nominees; thisisablog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
Old Harriet is still around.
1 posted on 05/08/2006 4:42:06 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cautor

Vetting nominees is her job.


2 posted on 05/08/2006 4:48:07 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
has allegedly vetoed several recommendations offered by conservatives to fill vacancies on federal courts.

Anybody who believes the above could be sold the Brooklyn Bridge in a heart beat.

3 posted on 05/08/2006 4:48:50 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

She did such a good job on herself, it's no wonder Bush has kept her on the payroll. He's loyal to old family friends and cronies like Harriet.


4 posted on 05/08/2006 4:49:03 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

As it is we still haven't seen any cases to get a good read of how the new justices will behave.


5 posted on 05/08/2006 4:49:37 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
Yeah, she put forth Roberts.

Lousy pick, eh?

6 posted on 05/08/2006 4:50:23 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Torie

You can believe anything you wish. It's not my story. I'm just passing along some news items.


7 posted on 05/08/2006 4:51:15 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

We have her and Andy Card to thank for all their tireless work on behalf of conservatives......zzzzzzzzzz


8 posted on 05/08/2006 4:51:16 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Somebody important make The Call.....pitchforks and lanterns.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Siena Dreaming

Fortunately, she was withdrawn (er...stepped aside) making it possible to have Roberts instead of her.

More from the story:

One conservative leader on the call said the only way for the White House to offer a real “new beginning” on judicial nominees was to bring in a new counsel in place of Miers. She was rumored to be on the way out after new Chief of Staff Josh Bolten took charge last month, but nothing has materialized since then.


9 posted on 05/08/2006 4:53:29 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
Guess we'd better just go ahead and impeach Roberts and Alito then. Miers helped pick them.
10 posted on 05/08/2006 4:53:33 PM PDT by CFC__VRWC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
Fortunately, she was withdrawn (er...stepped aside) making it possible to have Roberts instead of her

Wrong...it was Alito who was put up after Miers.

Harriet Miers suggested Roberts before that as SC Chief. Pretty bad choice, eh?

11 posted on 05/08/2006 4:55:13 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC

I'm sure she deserves all the credit, especially since she finally stepped aside so we could have Roberts instead.


12 posted on 05/08/2006 4:55:13 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
One conservative leader on the call said the only way for the White House to offer a real “new beginning” on judicial nominees was to bring in a new counsel in place of Miers. She was rumored to be on the way out after new Chief of Staff Josh Bolten took charge last month, but nothing has materialized since then.

Was one of the "leaders" Coulter? Did she refer to Miers as a "cleaning lady" again?

Some of these conservatives ought to keep their mouths shut, especially on judicial nominees.

They can't accept that they ran Miers off; they've got to continue to attack her.

Jerks.

13 posted on 05/08/2006 4:57:16 PM PDT by sinkspur ( I didn't know until just now that it was Barzini all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt
Meiers really messed up the vetting process with Alito and Roberts.

How dare she!!!!

We really needed another Souter.

14 posted on 05/08/2006 4:57:45 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Hey Sink, don't you have a bull riding contest to call over in Beaumont? It's always so nice to hear from you. I value your pithy comments as always.


15 posted on 05/08/2006 4:58:33 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
especially since she finally stepped aside so we could have Roberts instead

You're wrong again. Roberts came before Miers was put forth by Bush.

16 posted on 05/08/2006 4:58:51 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Cautor

Nope, it was Alito who replaced Meiers.


17 posted on 05/08/2006 4:58:59 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

My error. Thank you for the correction.


18 posted on 05/08/2006 5:00:13 PM PDT by Cautor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cautor
allegedly vetoed

I'm lookin' for disinformation here. Don't think Harriet is a problem.

19 posted on 05/08/2006 5:07:04 PM PDT by Navy Patriot (How come Mexican illegals don't sneak into Cuba?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Thank God she was run off. What a pitiful nominee for the U.S. Supreme court she was.
As Limbaugh said today, the President isn't a conservative he is a politician. He proves it every day with stunts like the Harriet Miers nomination.


20 posted on 05/08/2006 5:15:47 PM PDT by em2vn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson