Non-serious URL. Blog flogging?
Other excellent scientific-methodology type resources:
www.ICR.org
www.AnswersInGenesis.org
Now that this has been moved to Bloggers/Personal, a note or two:
1. Calling a site anything with the word "sucks" in the URL is not a really good way to attract folks looking for educational tools.
2. Several pro-creationism sites already exist, and are well known.
3. Blogs are NEVER Breaking News. Flogging your blog is not a good tactic on FR.
All the asinine rhetoric used by evolutionists is being thrown back in their faces.
Reading more ...
"The site; www.evolutionsucks.org is designed with students in mind, "
Yeah, the large bolded title "EVOLUTION SUCKS!!" is really what I want my kids using for "educational purposes".
The entire site was filled with misinformation and questions that are unanswered by Creationism.
In short, that website "SUCKS".
Why the name? Are you obsessed with thoughts of falatio?
re: "The site; www.evolutionsucks.org is designed with students in mind, young and old alike"
A site name that "sucks" hardly is designed for those seeking facts and the truth. A terrible choice of name. And we wonder why we aren't taken seriously by the other side.
Question #5
"the speed of light is a constant as summed up in E=Mc2"
leads to Question #8.
Do you think you might want to either rephrase or research that one.
But it's so gay
Excellent site.
Lots of material to counter the evolution cultists.
Appropriate site name, to boot.
Bookmarked.
Following are facts extreme evolutionists don't want the public to know.
1. I am a recently retired public middle school mathematics teacher in West Virginia with over 30 years experience as an educator including administration.
For the last five years of my full-time career, with the full knowledge of State, County, and ACLU officials, I demonstrated to my students that mathematics proves beyond the shadow of doubt that evolutionism is nonsense. The students saw that the evidence clearly shows that every item associated with humans, animals and plants are Intelligent Designs and Intelligent Design is science because it is observable by billions of people trillions of times, always has been, always will be. I always let them figure it out for themselves and allowed them to believe what they chose, but at least they were exposed to the scientific facts that extremists want to censor from the minds of public school students. After the lesson a student from an atheist family said, "Evolution is silly."
2. Currently, as a substitute teacher, I have contact with more public school students than ever and take advantage of every opportunity to provide them with the facts described above.
3. Evolutionists are bluffing when they say their beliefs are scientific. Be sure to look at the list of evolutionists who refuse the debate challenge from my friend Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo. See the list at http://www.csulb.edu/~jmastrop/. Click on the Life Science Prize at the bottom.
Karl Priest
kcpriest@aol.com
Ha - ha - ha. (Opinion masquerading as fact.) Life is one continual joke.
I haven’t visited an evolution thread on FR in quite some time.
Nice to see they are still “you suck... no YOU suck” type of threads..
Carry on ....
To say that evosucks was made for students is the talk of charlatans. Creationists have strawman arguements while claiming accomplishment by refuting 100 year old science. Everyone knows Eco science is shoddy because ours tools have only been refined for few decades. Even without our modern tools, there is no debating the lineage between Australopithecus, homo habilis, homo erectus and homo sapien sapien.
so pauli, let’s hear what you think. What is homo habilis, homo erectus and Neanderthal? Do you honestly think that God placed these creatures on Earth in 3 seperate instances and that they have no connection with us? Do you think that mapping the human genome is another cultist conspiracy, if not, you must admit that a chimps DNA is 98 percent related to a human.