[gondramB]

Just because the author can find someone who misused or misrepresented or was wrong about evolution doesn't invalidate evolution.

You don't have to go back 50 years to have people misuse or misrepresent Christianity but that doesn't in any way invalidate Christianity.

[staytrue]

If it was good for the evolutionists in 1925, then it should be good for them today.

This article tries to make evolution look bad. In reality, quotes like the above make the ID people look bad.

[Dog Gone]

Let’s make the evolutionists own up to their racist, elitist, and supremacist past.

Let's not. The arguments stand on the facts as we know them today, not some stupid ad hominem attacks on people not alive to defend themselves.

[GSlob]

"Hunter writes that ‘there is an immense mental gap between monkey and man.’"
Not always there is such a gap, not always. Hunter was a hopeless optimist.

[msnimje]

Why not explore both theories with your children, neither one is going to hurt them. If you believe in one and not the other, study them both and compare.

I am so thankful I homeschool because we can explore anything and everything to whatever degree we want.

[Coleus]

Intelligent Design Grounded in Strong Science

Tom Bethell Puts Darwinism on Defense

Intelligent Design Verdict Will Have Wide Impact on Schools

Court Battle over Intelligent Design and Evolution

Evolution: Science or Atheism in Disguise?

[thomaswest]

You wrote: "...In fact, how do we “know” anything?"

Reply: You might consider education. Astrolgy, holy texts from different cultures, and nostradamus have not been reliable.